The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network randomized clinical trial in progress: standard therapy versus no therapy for mild gestational diabetes.
نویسندگان
چکیده
I t is recognized that women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who have significantly elevated fasting blood glucose levels are at increased risk for fetal macrosomia and perinatal morbidity if treatment is not provided (1,2). The association of milder forms of GDM with perinatal morbidity and mortality remains unclear, primarily because the condition is often confounded with other risk factors such as maternal obesity, age, and parity. Screening for GDM is recommended for most pregnant women, yet it is unknown whether there is a benefit to the identification and treatment of mild carbohydrate intolerance during pregnancy (3,4). The present report is an update of our previous description of a current ongoing randomized treatment trial for mild GDM (5). A randomized clinical trial of women with mild GDM (fasting glucose 95 mg/dl) is being undertaken that compares perinatal outcomes in those receiving diet therapy and insulin as required versus those randomized to no specific treatment. This study aims to clarify whether there is utility in identifying and treating women with a normal fasting glucose level who meet standard criteria for GDM. We plan to compare perinatal outcomes in women who have been randomized to diet and/or insulin therapy with women who have been randomized to no specific treatment. A randomized treatment trial of mild GDM will clarify whether identification and treatment of mild GDM reduce perinatal morbidity. This information will assist in determining appropriate thresholds for the treatment of GDM.
منابع مشابه
Single-Agent Therapy for Low Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (LRGTN): A Preliminary Report on a Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Pulse-Methotrexate versus Pulse-Dactinomycin
The efficacy of single-agent chemotherapy for patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTN) with methotrexate or dactinomycin is well established, but efforts continue to reduce the toxicity, the patients time and cost of treatment. In a randomized clinical trial, we evaluated and compared the efficacy, toxicity and cost effectiveness of pulse-methotrexate versus pulse-dact...
متن کاملSublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
Background: We sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the termination of pregnancy with a live full-term fetus.Methods: This randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed on 200 primiparous women with normal, singleton, full-term pregnancies candidated for the induction of labor. Sublingual and vaginal tablets cont...
متن کاملEfficacy of insulin targeted gene therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of rodent studies
Objective(s): Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major worldwide public health challenge, for which gene therapy offers a potential therapeutic approach. To date, no systematic review or meta-analysis has been published in this area, so we examined all relevant published studies on rodents to elucidate the overall effects of gene therapy on bodyweight, intraperitoneal glucose...
متن کاملWhat we have learned regarding antibiotic therapy for the reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes.
Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (pPROM) is responsible for approximately one third of the over 450,000 preterm births occurring in the United States annually. In this manuscript, we summarize the outcomes and analyses related to the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network (NICHD-MFMU) network multicenter trial of antibiotics to r...
متن کاملVaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
We want to compare the efficacy and safety of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. This randomized clinical trial was performed on 140 women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: vaginal and sublingual administration of misoprostol. In first group, 25 µg misoprostol was placed...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Diabetes care
دوره 30 Suppl 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007